So do you need 4 RF ports on the antenna or what? Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:46 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's just like a lot of other Ubiquiti (and Mikrotik too). Half-assed. If it > was 80 MHz channels and otherwise same specs (now that they added SFP), it > could be a great product (pending how their N connector diplexer idea works > out). It doesn't, so it could only hope to achieve being a good product. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 9:22:00 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 > > 1024QAM? Depends on the link. Need more margin? Add more dish. > > >> On Sep 6, 2016 9:18 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, it'll be enough for a lot of links, but it won't get you a full gig... >> >> >>> On Sep 6, 2016 9:12 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If it's dual polarity you won't need 80MHz wide. 40mhz x 2 should be plenty >>> for -most- links. >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Look at the page with the spectral analysis. It says 56 MHz produces a 65 - >>> 79 MHz wide carrier. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>> >>> The Brothers WISP >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >>> To: "af" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:00:23 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >>> >>> 56mhz is what they originally said, but don't the emission designators >>> listed here indicate it'll do 80mhz? >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only >>>> does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are >>>> allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course. >>>> >>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> They're only 56 MHz wide. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> >>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>> >>>>> The Brothers WISP >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? >>>>> >>>>> I am hopeful it won't suck. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX >>>>>> >
