But that’s not what I’m talking about. I’m wondering if when a customer talks
about “buffering”, he really means having to wait for the video to start
And maybe I’m confused because I assume everyone is using Netflix. And I’m
pretty sure Netflix starts the stream at a low quality so it starts quickly,
and then ramps up the quality as the buffer fills, since their technology
allows changing the stream quality on the fly. Other services like maybe Hulu
and Amazon Prime may behave differently.
Also with my default assumption that people are using Netflix, I don’t expect
rebuffering because it’s been years since Netflix needed to stop and rebuffer
at a lower stream rate, I think they do that pretty seamlessly now.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 9:09 PM
To: af <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] "buffering"
Well, people certainly want connections that support multiple streams. Paying
for it, I'm not so sure about... at least around these parts.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com
<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > wrote:
Have you ever seen a 1080p youtube video load on a 1GbE active-E FTTH ISP that
has direct peering with Google from a router 2.5ms upstream? It's a beautiful
People will absolutely pay for connections that support multiple streams, take
a typical family of 4 or 5 people with kids that want to watch videos on
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com> > wrote:
When people say their video is “buffering”, I assume they mean re-buffering,
where the video stops and starts.
I’m starting to wonder if some people are referring to the delay before the
video starts playing. Is this a thing? And do people pay for faster Internet
just to make the video start faster, like cut 15-20 seconds down to 5 or 10