Agreed On Oct 16, 2016 2:53 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> No, FOX=CNN-MSNBC > > *From:* Sean Heskett > *Sent:* Sunday, October 16, 2016 1:43 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, > assassination at his rallies > > So FOX/CNN = MSNBC ??? > > > > On Sunday, October 16, 2016, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> FOX + MSNBC = CNN >> >> *From:* Lewis Bergman >> *Sent:* Sunday, October 16, 2016 1:35 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, >> assassination at his rallies >> >> Sadly, as much as any of them are now. >> >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 2:25 PM That One Guy /sarcasm < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Was fox ever an actual news entity? >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2016 1:50 PM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Would that be all the papers that met with the Clinton Campaign to >>>> organize the message? They left serious new journalism a long time ago. >>>> Wikieleaks is a pain that way, showing the truth and all that. The only >>>> ones the Clinton Campaign didn’t invite was Fox. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Stefan >>>> Englhardt >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 15, 2016 10:07 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, >>>> assassination at his rallies >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Bild is no paper you should take as reference. It is just big letters >>>> and made for people who barely could read but don't understand. >>>> >>>> But serious papers don't like Trump, too. Trump does give a very bad >>>> picture of US to other nations. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>>> Von: Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>>> Datum: 16.10.2016 03:48 (GMT+01:00) >>>> An: af@afmug.com >>>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, >>>> assassination at his rallies >>>> >>>
