I looked at that email. I didn't recognize any names on it. Frankly, I
wondered why CNBC was even on it.
Overlooking the debate they did, I rarely see any political commentary on there
at all.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason McKemie
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, assassination at
his rallies
Not even close. People like to argue that it is the same thing slanted right
as any other news source is slanted left, but that simply isn't the case.
I'm not going to say other news sources do their supposed job and don't have
a slant, but Fox "News" is so far off the reservation it is ridiculous.
On Sunday, October 16, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
Was fox ever an actual news entity?
On Oct 16, 2016 1:50 PM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:
Would that be all the papers that met with the Clinton Campaign to
organize the message? They left serious new journalism a long time ago.
Wikieleaks is a pain that way, showing the truth and all that. The only ones
the Clinton Campaign didn’t invite was Fox.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 10:07 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, assassination
at his rallies
Bild is no paper you should take as reference. It is just big letters and
made for people who barely could read but don't understand.
But serious papers don't like Trump, too. Trump does give a very bad
picture of US to other nations.
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
Datum: 16.10.2016 03:48 (GMT+01:00)
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] OT. Trump's supporters talk rebellion, assassination
at his rallies
