'thats sweet' = that really sucks, right? I kinda hate that model. Lightning has no time for a RMA.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:29 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > im hoping the sm software is full feature for short ptp, but i doubt it > is. > licensed is locked to the AP, but you can RMA a failed AP and move the > license to the RMA unit, thats sweet > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >> >> >> >> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and >> some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers >> here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >> >> >> >> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> This ought to shake things up a bit. >> >> >> >> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >> >> >> >> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >> >> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >> >> www.businesswire.com >> >> / >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
