I am a bit sarcastic I know ;-)). But indeed both shop the same standard 
Atheros Chipsets. Dont know what UBNT-Model has the exact same 11n chipset as 
the ePMP CPE.



They claim to elevate >25 CPEs/AP. This is the kind of Marketing which makes me 
sarcastic.







Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Adam Moffett
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:29
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!



Compatible doesn't mean "same".  Software for an Intel 386 is compatible with 
an Intel Core isn't it?



Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n.





------ Original Message ------

From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!



They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the oldest 
UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW.





Von: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Im Auftrag 
von That One Guy /sarcasm
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12
An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!



you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace  and some 
hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers here with a 
pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access



On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I signed up 
for it but now im all giddy like a school girl



On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

I prefer the Cambium direct link: 
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/



Very interesting indeed... very interesting.



On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

This ought to shake things up a bit.



http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/




 <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/>

 <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> /

www.businesswire.com <http://www.businesswire.com>

/











--

If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.







--

If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.



Reply via email to