No, they're saying the FCC certification is dependent on the hardware, so as long as it originally supported DFS frequencies it will with the ePMP software. Not sure how that works with the whole UBNT sticker mess, but I'm guessing that it's probably just going to treat them all as being unlocked, and it'll be our responsibility to make sure it actually has the new stickers already.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > Did this stuff have to get new FCC certification? Does it need new FCCID > stickers? Does it have all DFS frequencies? > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well, right. You probably want to be careful about any doing any firmware >> upgrades on UBNT radios that you're planning on switching, but otherwise >> there's really nothing they can do to anything that's already out there. >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 35/SM 315/10 SM >>> SM software is free >>> If UBNT locks the hardware it would have to be new hardware that wont >>> take the current UBNT firmware, essentially, if your gear is deployed or in >>> your shop, UBNT cant do squat >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I missed the start of the webinar... so this just requires, a license >>>> on the AP? what kind of cost are they talking about? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> better than buying new licenses >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'thats sweet' = that really sucks, right? I kinda hate that model. >>>>>> Lightning has no time for a RMA. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:29 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> im hoping the sm software is full feature for short ptp, but i doubt >>>>>>> it is. >>>>>>> licensed is locked to the AP, but you can RMA a failed AP and move >>>>>>> the license to the RMA unit, thats sweet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as >>>>>>>> the oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the >>>>>>>> same >>>>>>>> SW. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One >>>>>>>> Guy /sarcasm >>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>>>>> access >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when >>>>>>>> I signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >
