Did this stuff have to get new FCC certification? Does it need new FCCID stickers? Does it have all DFS frequencies?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, right. You probably want to be careful about any doing any firmware > upgrades on UBNT radios that you're planning on switching, but otherwise > there's really nothing they can do to anything that's already out there. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 35/SM 315/10 SM >> SM software is free >> If UBNT locks the hardware it would have to be new hardware that wont >> take the current UBNT firmware, essentially, if your gear is deployed or in >> your shop, UBNT cant do squat >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I missed the start of the webinar... so this just requires, a license on >>> the AP? what kind of cost are they talking about? >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> better than buying new licenses >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 'thats sweet' = that really sucks, right? I kinda hate that model. >>>>> Lightning has no time for a RMA. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:29 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> im hoping the sm software is full feature for short ptp, but i doubt >>>>>> it is. >>>>>> licensed is locked to the AP, but you can RMA a failed AP and move >>>>>> the license to the RMA unit, thats sweet >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same >>>>>>> SW. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One >>>>>>> Guy /sarcasm >>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>>>> access >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> / >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > >
