we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this might give us a better window
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible > with an Intel Core isn't it? > > Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the > oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and > some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers > here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > > im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I > signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > > I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www. > cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ > > > > Very interesting indeed... very interesting. > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This ought to shake things up a bit. > > > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ > > > > <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > www.businesswire.com > > / > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
