there is law then there is LAW would it require somebody contesting a lowly wisp and a win in court to establish a caselaw specific to the industry? i dont know how that stuff works at all, criminal law im pretty familiar, but this stuff is outside my scope for sure
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, about then. I posted fragments as well as a link the whole 800 page > document. > > *From:* Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 7:11 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Here's a question for a can of worms > > > I think it became law in June from what I remember. > > On Dec 1, 2016 8:01 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> when does any of this become a set in stone thing >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks... does anyone know what would be the process to 'test' the >>> waters. >>> >>> say, we would like to install a pole on the ROW.... >>> >>> Suggestion ? >>> >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Faisal Imtiaz >>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>> Miami, FL 33155 >>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232> >>> >>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: "Mark Radabaugh" <[email protected]> >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:07:59 PM >>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Here's a question for a can of worms >>> >>> > In theory - yes. >>> > >>> > But keep in mind ROW is a state, county, city, or {insert political >>> entity} >>> > designation and that the FCC’s decision doesn’t actually get you >>> anything until >>> > the authority having jurisdiction {AHJ} decides to honor the FCC’s >>> decision. >>> > As far as I know there have not been any legal cases to test the issue >>> yet. >>> > With the current state of political affairs it’s hard to say if the >>> FCC’s >>> > Title II decision is going to stand. >>> > >>> > While you are filing that 477, make sure you make all the required >>> disclosures >>> > and filings that go with it. You have about another 2 weeks worth of >>> filling >>> > out papers before you serve those 4 customers. >>> > >>> > Mark >>> > >>> >> On Dec 1, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Here is a stupid question. What is the official designation of an >>> ISP? Can I >>> >> get a cable connection, re-distribute it to 4 people wirelessly, >>> file form 477 >>> >> and get access to the right of way? >>> >> >>> >> Chuck McCown wrote: >>> >>> Works everywhere. If the CATV has pole access you do too. Same >>> thing with >>> >>> streets and other public places. >>> >>> They may charge you a franchise fee, but it has to be the same as >>> everyone else. >>> >>> *From:* Kurt Fankhauser >>> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 12:26 PM >>> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Here's a question for a can of worms >>> >>> Does that even work in the municipal boundaries not just rural? I >>> was thinking >>> >>> about deploying fiber in the city here and didn't know if the city >>> could stop >>> >>> me if they wanted too. >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> What Chuck said. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 1, 2016 1:22 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Absolutely. You are a BIAS provider and the FCC explicitly >>> >>> defined BIAS providers as being eligible for ROW access equal >>> >>> to a public utility. >>> >>> *From:* Ben Royer >>> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 12:20 PM >>> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Here's a question for a can of worms >>> >>> Get out your can openers. Does me, the ISP, being classified >>> >>> as a common carrier, mean I get right of way access? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Ben Royer, Operations Manager >>> >>> Royell Communications, Inc. >>> >>> 217-965-3699 <tel:%28217%29%20965-3699> www.royell.net >>> >>> <http://www.royell.net> >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this message. >>> >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >>> >>> Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4664/13518 - Release Date: >>> 12/01/16 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
