If I order a 800-GIGE-APC-HV it should have improvements for sync to work with gigabit? We exclusively use shielded cable outdoors. The ones I have tried say GigEAPC Rev A.1 with magic marker HV.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > Everyone that got the new rev products reported good results. I was able to > replicate it in the lab. However if the grounds are noisy nothing is going > to fix it. > > -----Original Message----- From: Matt > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Rackmount Injector Update > > Has the issue with sync-injector standard sync -> GIGE-APC-HV -> 250ft > cat-5 -> PMP450i and gigabit ethernet link been fixed somehow? I have > some PTP450i's I need bit more then 100mbps on. > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Cambium sync is going to happen... but I didn't want to hold this injector >> any longer. >> >> My choice was to ship a functional, solid, working injector now which does >> everything but cambium sync, or hold it for a few more months. At some >> point I just have to ship something, instead of waiting until some fictional >> future point where there aren't any additional features to be added. >> >> The advantage here is that the controller and enclosure will remain the >> same. Customers who want cambium sync can wait a bit more, or can buy the >> system as it is and swap out boards as needed down the road. >> >> The other driving factor is that Cambium sync will be increasing the sale >> price by at least $10 and maybe as much as $20 per port. This means that >> there is a good chance that a fully loaded cambium sync rackinjector will >> cost around $250 more than the non-cambium sync version. For those people >> who don't need cambium sync, this is a big jump for a feature they don't >> need, so I'll be selling both versions. >> >> -forrest >> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> New installations will be biased toward new APs, so Cambium sync may be a >>> critical feature. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian >>> (List Account) >>> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 9:30 AM >>> To: af <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Rackmount Injector Update >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes. Currently there is only one board type for the slots... You will be >>> able to order it with any number of slots filled - the rest will have blanks >>> put in place. It is designed so end users can add, remove or swap each >>> board. >>> >>> >>> >>> The current board is essentially our current powerinjector+sync in that >>> form factor - 4 ports, each jumperable for any gigabit-compatible power >>> scheme, and each jumperable to select one of the three voltage input >>> sources. >>> >>> >>> >>> There are two additional board types on the drawing board. The one most >>> interesting to my existing customers will add support for cambium sync which >>> is compatible with the 450i and 450m. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:12 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> is this mix and match for the 4 slots? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> For those eagerly waiting for the RackMount Injector.... >>> >>> >>> >>> The engineering validations I mentioned before have been completed. I >>> discovered one minor board error, which has been corrected. I also took >>> advantage of the additional board revision to make another minor circuit >>> revision which will improve performance. At this point, what we hope are >>> the final verification boards are on order. Because of how minor the >>> revision was to the boards, we have decided to go ahead and release this to >>> part purchasing - which basically means we're buying everything we need to >>> actually build these. We should be able to validate the final board >>> revision and have actual production boards here before all of the other >>> parts arrive. This will also give us a chance to modify the circuit board >>> if we discover a parts availability issue during the purchasing process. >>> >>> >>> We've issued almost all of the purchase orders for parts for the first >>> production run - we're now waiting for final confirmation of delivery dates. >>> I expect these this week, with the caveat that in a couple of cases we're >>> dealing with the non-joys of trying to get things done during China's spring >>> festival holiday. At least one vendor is shut down completely until the >>> 3rd, and I'm sure there will be a bit of backlog when everyone returns to >>> work. >>> >>> Once I have confirmed orders with estimated ship dates and validated >>> pricing for almost everything, I'll get the unit up on the website to do >>> pre-orders with a semi-definite ship date. At this point, I'm guessing >>> either just before or just after WISPAMERICA. We're hoping for just before >>> since I would much rather tell people that the product is shipping than >>> explain why it isn't. But the reality is that there isn't much time before >>> WISPAMERICA so I'm guessing I'll be explaining. >>> >>> One more teaser image is attached. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >>> >>> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >>> >>> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. >> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >> >> >
