Jason, No there isn't a web interface for what I have. I don't know what's available from ZTE USA.
I'm testing a third party web based management software called Ikarus. http://www.ztegpon.com/index.php?page=ikarus Gerard On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Jason McKemie < [email protected]> wrote: > I received an email. > > So there is no web-based administration? Command line would suffice if > that was available, but I'm not interested in writing my own management > system at this juncture. > > Looking at the numbers I still feel that active is more suited to my > deployment unless I needed to shoehorn a group of customers onto limited > fiber. > > > On Thursday, March 9, 2017, Gerard Dupont III <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1xC320 Chassis >> 1xSMXA/3 10G main control board (SMXA/1 for 1G uplinks only) >> 1xPRAM AC Power Supply/battery charger board >> 1xGTGH 16port OLT board >> 16xC++ OLT SFP Modules >> 1xFan tray >> +Power Cords >> >> This leaves a free slot which you can install a 16 port GPON or EPON >> board or a 24 port SFP board for 48 AE customers using CSFP modules. >> >> If you already have +/- 48volt available, you can get a second SMXA >> instead of the PRAM and have redundant control boards and more uplink >> capacity. >> >> Did anyone else get an email from a ZTE sales rep after posting on this >> thread? >> >> Gerard >> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Gerad, got a part number list to share? >>> >>> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Gerard Dupont < >>> [email protected]> >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 8:17 AM >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >>> >>> Custom scripts that use the cli and snmp. For our latest build we are >>> trying Ikarus. (Ikarus has the functionality, but I hate the web interface. >>> Trying to get them to redesign it for us.) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Gino Villarini* >>> President >>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:39 AM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> What tools are you using for management? >>>> >>>> On Mar 8, 2017 10:01 PM, "Gerard Dupont III" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris, >>>>> >>>>> Nothing I have requires any additional fees. I'm not using their >>>>> management system and I don't have any support at all. Yes, from a seller >>>>> we originally found on Alibaba. >>>>> >>>>> Gerard >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:05 PM Chris Fabien <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Gerard, >>>>>> Looking at Baltic's website they seem to sell several software >>>>>> licenses for this ZTE GPON equipment. Like $50 per PON Port license, >>>>>> $5.50 >>>>>> per ONT, etc. Also $2100 for some server software. Are these required? >>>>>> Are >>>>>> you buying them on AliBaba? Or does it somehow work without the >>>>>> licenscing/server software? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Chris >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Gerard Dupont III < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> That's the chassis. Then add the GTGH 16 port line card or the GTGO >>>>>>> 8 port card. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We use the Huawei ETP4830-A1 power supply and a string of telco >>>>>>> batteries or you can replace one of the SMXA supervisor/uplink cards >>>>>>> with a >>>>>>> PRAM and do AC directly inside the C320. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are slight differences between these parts. For example, the >>>>>>> SMXA uplink card has different subcards. One is 10G and other is just >>>>>>> 1G. >>>>>>> Card SMXA subcard UCDC/3 is what you want for 10G. Same for the >>>>>>> ETP4830-A1, >>>>>>> one of the subcards has ethernet and the other 2 models only have >>>>>>> RS232/RS485. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Jason McKemie < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Is something like this a smaller version of what you're using? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://wholesaler.alibaba.com/product-detail/Original-ZTE-O >>>>>>>> LT-ZXA10-Mini-Device_60221381720.html?spm=a2700.7724838.0.0. >>>>>>>> zODsrR&s=p >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, so my keyboard makes me look drunk Gerard says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've got 4 chassis's no problem, all with Class C optics. LOL! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Chuck >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've to 4 chassis so far and never a problem. Not buying >>>>>>>>>> Alphion, ZTE. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Chuck >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Paul Stewart < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting …. do they work ok? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I came from Calix and Adtran world for GPON/ONT stuff … >>>>>>>>>>> considerably more than that. I did look at some DWDM stuff from >>>>>>>>>>> China and >>>>>>>>>>> it was total junk in my opinion - some people like it .. not my >>>>>>>>>>> thing. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm importing direct from China. 16Port OLT with Class Optics >>>>>>>>>>> and Power Supply for $3200. ONT's for $25. PLC's from $2-10 >>>>>>>>>>> depending on >>>>>>>>>>> the split. Check Alibaba. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Chuck >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:31 PM, George Skorup < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yup. My plan is to start 32:1 and knock it down to 16:1 and >>>>>>>>>>>> throw in another OLT if needed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/6/2017 12:01 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Google did 32x1. Common at the time of their initial deployment >>>>>>>>>>>> was 64x1. The company I just got off the ground did 16x1. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2017 11:47 AM, "Sterling Jacobson" < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> AE gets to be a headache with power costs and heat control in >>>>>>>>>>>>> cabinets. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Low oversub GPON is plenty good for now and probably well into >>>>>>>>>>>>> the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe that is what Google did, maybe 8:1 max split? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The temptation with GPON is to stretch it to the limits, which >>>>>>>>>>>>> might cause some re-splicing down the road if you want super high >>>>>>>>>>>>> FDX. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> AE doesn’t have that problem even with equipment a decade old >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can still supply the same SFP+ switch with 180Gbps each if I >>>>>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>>>>>> carry that much on the backhaul. Equipment is super cheap, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s >>>>>>>>>>>>> essentially backwards compatible with GPON if your neighborhood >>>>>>>>>>>>> runs are >>>>>>>>>>>>> short like mine. But again, lots of power is required. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck >>>>>>>>>>>>> McCown >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 5, 2017 8:08 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Calix has NG PON2 which does 10 Gbps per wavelength and >>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple wavelengths all overlaid on GPON so nothing in the OSP >>>>>>>>>>>>> has to >>>>>>>>>>>>> change. All the splitters etc still work. That will give >>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone on the >>>>>>>>>>>>> PON 312.5 Mbps symmetrical all at the same time. So >>>>>>>>>>>>> oversubscribing 3:1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> you could sell 1G symmetrical to everyone and probably not run >>>>>>>>>>>>> out of >>>>>>>>>>>>> headroom. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Carlos Alcantar >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 05, 2017 3:35 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to add to this post with the new PON technologies being >>>>>>>>>>>>> released this year giving everyone 1G FDX is going to be a non >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Alcantar >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Race Communications / Race Team Member >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: +1 415 376 3314 <%28415%29%20376-3314> / >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] / http://www.race.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of George Skorup < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:44:29 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not really worried about POTS and RF. Everyone is using >>>>>>>>>>>>> cell phones and watching Netflix. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The AE deployment is a total waste of equipment and resources >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the utilization we're seeing. I have to go there next week >>>>>>>>>>>>> and turn up >>>>>>>>>>>>> another switch. The 1Gbps feed is averaging less than 100Mbps >>>>>>>>>>>>> every night. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The network owner was convinced that everyone had to have 1G FDX. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They just >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't realize how much electronics and power is required for 1k >>>>>>>>>>>>> ports. >>>>>>>>>>>>> There's less than 100 customers so far, so please, for the love >>>>>>>>>>>>> of god, >>>>>>>>>>>>> lets fix this now! We'll see what happens. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway.. this project we're looking to do on our own is a >>>>>>>>>>>>> neighborhood of rich bitches. We already have PMP450 there and it >>>>>>>>>>>>> works >>>>>>>>>>>>> fine. They "want more speed" and if they're willing to put up >>>>>>>>>>>>> some cash for >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, then we'll build it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2017 9:55 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alphion does, yes. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 2017 9:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What kind of costs are you talking? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Does it talk to ONTs? ONTs with POTS ports? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sterling is AE, I know his costs are pretty low. >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup Sent: Saturday, >>>>>>>>>>>>> March 04, 2017 8:39 PM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We're looking to do another "fiberhood" with GPON instead of >>>>>>>>>>>>> AE this time around. I remember Chuck Hogg mentioned Alphion. Has >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed the AOLT-4200? Looks like a good solution. Or what else >>>>>>>>>>>>> have you >>>>>>>>>>>>> used for small deployments? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>
