You drive more than 130mph often?

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 130mph top speed according to the spec sheet, Lol
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We don't get monetary credit.  Just kWh credit and if you  are a net
>> producer you lose all  your credits each March so no incentive to overbuild.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince
>> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 12:01 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Tesla
>>
>> Not here.
>>
>> In California, grid-tied solar buys electricity from the grid (when the
>> site needs it) at retail prices, but sells it back to the grid at
>> wholesale prices (when generating).
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 3/20/2017 10:58 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
>>
>>> I’d have to double check the exact amount but here in Ontario, the power
>>> you sell back at something like 90 cents Kwh … very inflated to encourage
>>> more people to generate their own power and sell it back to the “system” -
>>> in my opinion it’s driven the price of purchasing/consuming power
>>> artificially high as well … real problem here….
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My solar system stores energy in the form of gravity potential...
>>>>
>>>> On 3/20/17 5:59 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My solar system stores excess energy as credit on the bill.  So I can
>>>>> use it anytime of day.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Rory Conaway
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, March 20, 2017 3:21 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Tesla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Our rate is 5.9 cents per kWh under a special program for electric car
>>>>> owners.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Most of my wife’s driving is 70mph or less and more city driving than
>>>>> what you probably do.  We probably charge 50 miles per day average and
>>>>> the car gets about 3.5-4m per kWh.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Our worst rate is about 10.1 cents per kWh on peak during the week.
>>>>> Solar doesn’t help us in charging since the care is gone at 7:30am and
>>>>> doesn’t get home until after 6:30.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rory
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:50 PM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Tesla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting about 1 mile per percent.  I never trust that display, I
>>>>> always use battery percentage.  But I drive 80 mph everywhere, freeway.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am solar powered at my house and other people pay for the power other
>>>>> places I charge.   So there is no cost of energy for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But if I was paying, it would be about 12 cents per kWh  (it can go as
>>>>> low as 8 cents depending on how you do  it).  So $3.60/charge or 3
>>>>> cents
>>>>> per mile.  (2.4 cents per mile at the lower tariff)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hyundai was getting 34 mpg.  So 7.4 cents per mile.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:*Rory Conaway
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:*Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:57 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:*[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] OT Tesla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So after 2 days with the Leaf and the 30Kw battery, our estimate is
>>>>> that
>>>>> it’s actually underrated or they have found other ways to save power.
>>>>> I
>>>>> definitely notice more aggressive regen control on eco mode but we are
>>>>> seeing 120-125 mile on the display even after using 5-8% of the
>>>>> battery.   Considering you can drive one for about $4K a year, almost
>>>>> no
>>>>> maintenance, and about ¼ of the cost of gas, it’s got to be one of the
>>>>> best values out there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rory
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 18, 2017 9:08 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Tesla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I find it interesting they can upgrade a battery with software...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:*[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:*Saturday, March 18, 2017 10:06 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:*[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] OT Tesla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I highly doubt people were just buying the 75 as they say. Think this
>>>>> will hurt sales? They already did this to the Model X.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or are they hoping the Model 3 will fill the gap?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting note from Tesla this morning:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Customers who still want the opportunity to own a 60 kWh Model S will
>>>>> have until April 16, 2017 to place their order. Any 60 kWh Model S will
>>>>> have the ability to upgrade their battery to 75 kWh via an over the air
>>>>> update.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to