Please make it one size fits all. Like the gigE HV. I'm not stocking 3 products for 1 job.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > Peddling my bike as fast as I can go. I think it will be a no case > product. Two shielded RJ45s, PCB. 8 LEDS. 4 on one side of the fuses, 4 > on the other so you can see if any of the fuses have blown. Bare PCB > design. Perhaps painted with the LEDS showing through the paint. I think > I can fit it all in a 2 inch PCB. Short shielded CAT5 jumper. > > *From:* Mitch Koep > *Sent:* Saturday, March 25, 2017 3:14 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > > Look forward to getting some when your > > ready > > Mitch > > On 03/25/2017 09:20 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > That is exactly what it is. Universal for all POE products. > > *From:* Faisal Imtiaz > *Sent:* Saturday, March 25, 2017 8:16 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > >> > The external in line fuse product is ready for prototyping. > > Let us know how this goes, if the test are successful, I would suggest > making an 'external in-line fuse', which would make for a quick retrofit > for existing modules out there . > > > Thanks. > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 <(305)%20663-5518> x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: > [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Chuck McCown" mailto:[email protected] > > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, March 25, 2017 9:38:12 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > I would not put any surge protection on Netonix period, top or bottom. If > it is POE and powered by a passive source you run a risk of smoking it with > any surge suppressor. > > I have two devices designed, one is an ancillary fuse to put inline with > Netonix. The second is adding fusing to my surge protectors if I can fit > it in. The external in line fuse product is ready for prototyping. > > *From:* David Coudron > *Sent:* Saturday, March 25, 2017 7:35 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > > We are also very interested in this topic. We will be building out 10 > new towers in the next few months, and will be making the change to Netonix > switches (we had previously used a different type of switch). I the past > we had put Transtector surge protectors on the tower top and in the cabinet > on the ground. From what you are saying in thread, we should not plan on > surge protectors in the cabinet, but what is the recommended change for the > tower top, if any? > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > *David Coudron* > > [email protected] | *Mobile: *612-991-7474 <(612)%20991-7474> > > > > *Advantenon, Inc. * [image: cid:[email protected]] > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/Advantenon> [image: > cid:[email protected]] <http://www.twitter.com/Advantenon> > [image: > cid:[email protected]] <http://www.facebook.com/Advantenon> > [image: > cid:[email protected]] <http://blog.advantenon.com/> > > [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN > 55447 | www.advantenon.com | *Phone:* 800-704-4720 <(800)%20704-4720> | > *Local: *612-454-1545 <(612)%20454-1545> > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown > *Sent:* Saturday, March 25, 2017 8:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > > > If an impulse comes along and the surge suppressor clamps to ground, you > run the risk of smoking the Netonix POE transformer. It will not protect > itself against shorts. > > > > *From:* Josh Baird > > *Sent:* Saturday, March 25, 2017 7:23 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > > > What exactly is the reason? We always run through your surge protectors > before connecting to Netonix. > > > On Mar 25, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bypass ALL surge suppressors that are connected to Netonix, irrespective > of manufacturer. > > > > *From:* [email protected] > > *Sent:* Saturday, March 25, 2017 5:41 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > > > So we should now bypass all our APC-type surge suppressors that are > connected to Netonix? > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am going to fix this little problem... > > > > Netonix will fix your port for something like $25 > > > > *From:* Bill Prince > > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 8:56 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > > > Yeah. We accidentally hooked up an AF24 through a Cambium surge > suppressor, and it fragged the port on the Netonix. We were swapping from > something else that had been on the cable, and completely forgot that it > was going through that surge suppressor. Hard lesson learned. > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 3/24/2017 1:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > OK, had an exchange with Netonix today. It is just as Matt Hoppes said. > You short out their POE and it will blow the Ethernet transformer. > > > > I really presumed they had circuitry like Forrest that could detect and > shut down in an over current situation. They do have poly fuses which are > slow to react and may protect it from a very brief short, but longer shorts > will indeed harm the port feeding the transformer. > > > > So, Netonix is not active POE. I would say that on passive POE a plain > surge suppressor should not be used. I am working some “non plain” surge > suppressors now.... ;-) Stay tuned to this bat channel and a big thanks to > Matt for forcing me to learn something new. It was painful, but I can do > painful things when I have to. > > > > *From:* Chuck McCown > > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 10:01 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Netonix > > > > tnx > > > > *From:* Josh Luthman > > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 9:47 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Netonix > > > > chris.sisler > > ( A ) > > netlinx.net > > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone know the email for the guy that runs Netonix? > > > > > > > > > > -- > Mitch Koep > > A Better Wireless218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell > >
