If you're reaching an IPv6 destination, of course. No NAT is needed. If you're trying to reach an IPv4 destination, you'll need NAT.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:10:53 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants Why Nat at all with IPV6? On 05/11/2017 07:51 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote: You can do Carrier grade NAT with MT. Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com Office: 314-735-0270 E-Mail: [email protected] From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants Many if not most of us are in the same box. I need a router that goes on the edge and does something similar to NAT64/ds lite etc. Someone is going to make good money by developing “IPV6 in a box” appliance and then come and install deploy. Dennis, are you listening... From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent solution as I need to purchase another /22 this year. From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Chris Wright Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants I’m weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses to customers and know they’ll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue. Mikrotik doesn’t seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, so I’d be looking at adding complexity to my network if I go that direction. On the other hand, I don’t like spending thousands of dollars on antiquated address space if I can help it. I’d rather do my part in moving IP standards forward instead of staying stuck in the past. What’s working for you all? Chris Wright Network Administrator --
