Absolutely …I think Facebook or someone like that should do it… that’ll fix 
things in a hurry ;)

> On May 11, 2017, at 4:24 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> What will force the transition is the moment that google and/or some other 
> large provider starts to provide certain services only via IPv6.   
> 
> It would not surprise me to see this start occurring by certain providers for 
> certain desirable but not-core-business services.   
> 
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I want there to be a two day world wide event where we disable all hosted 
> IPv4 routing.
> 
>  
> 
> Then we’ll see which hosting services are stuck in the 1990’s and need to 
> upgrade immediately to IPv6.
> 
>  
> 
> That is what is stopping us.
> 
>  
> 
> And ISP, upstream providers not handling IPv6 transport or BGP IPv6…
> 
>  
> 
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:19 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
> 
>  
> 
> I want to just give the customer a V6 and the edge appliance will nat the v4 
> only destinations. 
> 
>  
> 
> From: Paul Stewart
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:45 PM
> 
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
> 
>  
> 
> We dual stack and will continue as long as possible …   really hoping to 
> avoid transition stuff but who knows for sure if that’s just a pipe dream or 
> not ;)
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On May 10, 2017, at 6:50 PM, Chris Wright <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> I’m weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or 
> finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses 
> to customers and know they’ll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue. 
> Mikrotik doesn’t seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, so I’d be 
> looking at adding complexity to my network if I go that direction. On the 
> other hand, I don’t like spending thousands of dollars on antiquated address 
> space if I can help it. I’d rather do my part in moving IP standards forward 
> instead of staying stuck in the past.
> 
>  
> 
> What’s working for you all?
> 
>  
> 
> Chris Wright
> 
> Network Administrator
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
> Tel: 406-449-3345 <> | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | http://www.packetflux.com 
> <http://www.packetflux.com/>
>  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  
> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
> 

Reply via email to