Speaking of ipv4..

Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants

If you're reaching an IPv6 destination, of course. No NAT is needed. If you're 
trying to reach an IPv4 destination, you'll need NAT.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]


<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
________________________________
From: "Dave" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants

Why Nat at all with IPV6?

On 05/11/2017 07:51 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
You can do Carrier grade NAT with MT.


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants

Many if not most of us are in the same box.  I need a router that goes on the 
edge and does something similar to NAT64/ds lite etc.  Someone is going to make 
good money by developing “IPV6 in a box” appliance and then come and install 
deploy.

Dennis, are you listening...

From: Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:54 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants

Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6

Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent solution as 
I need to purchase another /22 this year.

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Wright
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants

I’m weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or 
finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses to 
customers and know they’ll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue. 
Mikrotik doesn’t seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, so I’d be looking 
at adding complexity to my network if I go that direction. On the other hand, I 
don’t like spending thousands of dollars on antiquated address space if I can 
help it. I’d rather do my part in moving IP standards forward instead of 
staying stuck in the past.

What’s working for you all?

Chris Wright
Network Administrator


--
[cid:[email protected]]

Reply via email to