I want to only hand out V6 to our customers. Easy, can do that today. But when they get a DNS for a site that is V4, then we need to send that traffic to the NOC (on their V6 connection) where it gets routed to the V4 box which actually has some V4 addresses and vice versa on the return traffic.
Paint the box red like the Netflix appliance, come and install it for me, make it work. And I might even pay you in V4 addresses.... From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 6:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants You can do Carrier grade NAT with MT. Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com Office: 314-735-0270 E-Mail: [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants Many if not most of us are in the same box. I need a router that goes on the edge and does something similar to NAT64/ds lite etc. Someone is going to make good money by developing “IPV6 in a box” appliance and then come and install deploy. Dennis, are you listening... From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent solution as I need to purchase another /22 this year. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Wright Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants I’m weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses to customers and know they’ll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue. Mikrotik doesn’t seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, so I’d be looking at adding complexity to my network if I go that direction. On the other hand, I don’t like spending thousands of dollars on antiquated address space if I can help it. I’d rather do my part in moving IP standards forward instead of staying stuck in the past. What’s working for you all? Chris Wright Network Administrator
