[image: Inline image 1] On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
> Speaking of ipv4.. > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > > Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: [email protected] > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:12 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants > > > > If you're reaching an IPv6 destination, of course. No NAT is needed. If > you're trying to reach an IPv4 destination, you'll need NAT. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Dave" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:10:53 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants > > Why Nat at all with IPV6? > > > On 05/11/2017 07:51 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote: > > You can do Carrier grade NAT with MT. > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess** – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > > Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: [email protected] > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants > > > > Many if not most of us are in the same box. I need a router that goes on > the edge and does something similar to NAT64/ds lite etc. Someone is going > to make good money by developing “IPV6 in a box” appliance and then come > and install deploy. > > > > Dennis, are you listening... > > > > *From:* Sterling Jacobson > > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:54 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants > > > > Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 > > > > Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent > solution as I need to purchase another /22 this year. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Chris Wright > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:51 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants > > > > I’m weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction > or finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 > addresses to customers and know they’ll be able to get to IPv4 internet > without issue. Mikrotik doesn’t seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, > so I’d be looking at adding complexity to my network if I go that > direction. On the other hand, I don’t like spending thousands of dollars on > antiquated address space if I can help it. I’d rather do my part in moving > IP standards forward instead of staying stuck in the past. > > > > What’s working for you all? > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > > > -- > > >
