per splice removes the speed issue one guy can do maybe 10 an hour, one guy 5 normalizes costs plus its a specific dedicated piece of equipment, have to recoup that at a specific rate my guy charges 70 per non bulk splice, I think that's fair
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it’s around $5-$6 a foot is the metric for retail runs. > > > > So that’s $6 x 200 = $1200 total. > > > > Maybe a bit extra depending on the vaults and splice cases used in your > case since it’s a shorter run. > > > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2017 2:49 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rates for fiber repair > > > > It's about $100 in materials which I already have and 4 hours of labor. > > > > Just at T&M I feel like I'm way too low, which probably means I should > change how I'm billing it. :) > > So how do you arrive at $1500? What's the math? > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Chris Fabien" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: 7/31/2017 4:39:00 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rates for fiber repair > > > > Sounds like at least a $1500 job to me... > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm curious what some of you guys might charge for running 200' of new > cable through a conduit, adding a splice case at both ends of the conduit, > and splicing the old cable to the new section. > > > > This is on private property and the existing cable was broken (bent into a > hairpin by outside trauma) just outside the conduit. There's not enough > sticking out of the pipe to put a splice there, so I have to run a new > piece through the conduit. > > > > I guess the scope of work isn't that important though. I'm more > interested in how you bill it. I know some people use an hourly rate for > installing the cable and then a flat fee per splice. Is there a > justification for charging per splice as opposed to charging for T&M? Is > it to recoup the cost of the splicer perhaps? > > > > > > > >
