The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM?
From: Mitch Koep Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The one problem I have with towercoverage is the only monthly payment option is paypal. Credit card is by far safer. I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal IMO Mitch Koep On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <[email protected]> wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
