Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory
-----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>> x103 <tel:%28314%29%20735-0270> – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>> >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>> >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>> accurate as linkplanner? >>> >> > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>