The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one
to the other. There's some learning curve.
------ Original Message ------
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free.
I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am
comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am
pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM?
From:Mitch Koep
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM
To:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The one problem I have with towercoverage is
the only monthly payment option is paypal.
Credit card is by far safer.
I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal
IMO
Mitch Koep
On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the
data rates on?
On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net>
wrote:
Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J
Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 <tel:%28314%29%20735-0270> –
dmburg...@linktechs.net
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM
To:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at
a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70
RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise
without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in
modeling LTE.
Joe
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile
against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as
linkplanner?
