thanks
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Rick Harnish <[email protected]> wrote: > We have Atoll. Check with [email protected], if you need > propagation studies done. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > ---------[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]--------- > > Rick Harnish > > > > Director of WISP Markets > > > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > > > [email protected] > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 4:48 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > > do you guys have a propagation/profile tool like linkplanner available, or > in the works? > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Rick Harnish <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months. We > did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in > California last month. The other things Mark mentioned can be added > relatively easy. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > ---------[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]--------- > > Rick Harnish > > > > Director of WISP Markets > > > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > > > [email protected] > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > > SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment > certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next > year. > > > > Mark > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ > > > > > > I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there > is no SAS to test to > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? > > Rory > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? > > Adam Moffett wrote: > > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. > >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am > >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am > >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > >> *From:* Mitch Koep > >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > >> *To:* [email protected] > >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> > >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is > >> > >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. > >> > >> Credit card is by far safer. > >> > >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > >> > >> IMO > >> > >> Mitch Koep > >> > >> > >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the > >>> data rates on? > >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J > >>> > >>> Dennis Burgess > >>> > >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 > >>> x103 <tel:%28314%29%20735-0270 <%28314%29%20735-0270>> – > [email protected] > >>> > >>> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM > >>> *To:* [email protected] > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >>> > >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. > >>> > >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? > >>> > >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and > >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 > >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but > >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash > >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to > >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as > >>> accurate as linkplanner? > >>> > >> > > > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > > > >
