Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months. We did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in California last month. The other things Mark mentioned can be added relatively easy.
Respectfully, ------------------ Rick Harnish Director of WISP Markets <https://na.baicells.com/> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. Mobile: (972) 922-1443 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next year. Mark On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there is no SAS to test to On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> >>> <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 <tel:314-735-0270> >>> x103 <tel:%28314%29%20735-0270> – [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] >>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>> >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>> >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>> accurate as linkplanner? >>> >> > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > &utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u> > &utm_source=link&u > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
