so we are good with no time limit on an action, simply a time limit on due process?
I take it personally because a very good friend of mine did ten years as a class x felon in prison for aggravated sexual assault of a minor(and the things inside prison that go along with that) The "victim" has since recanted, the evidence was never there in the first place, a judges death mid trial and a new scorched earth judge led to his conviction. Hes still fighting to get it overturned, even with an affidavit recantation on record. So I dont put alot of salt in accusations, very old and politically expedient ones at that On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > Perfect example of a strawman. > That's not what Gino said at all. > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 12/7/2017 12:43:54 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT slightly political > > So you think you should potentially lose your company for making an > unwanted catcall or advance 35 years ago the same as you would had you done > it today? > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Gino A. Villarini <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Time should not determine if something is right or wrong. Its a binary >> thing. You can’t be half pregnant. >> >> Acceptable, tolerable or not spoken about does not equal correctness or >> right >> >> It has long been know that powerful men prey on woman on Hollywood…. >> >> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck McCown < >> [email protected]> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 12:38 PM >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT slightly political >> >> I watched Dustin Hoffman get ambushed on a news show the other day. The >> guy doing the questioning was grilling him on stuff that supposedly >> happened 40 years ago. >> >> Who is the same person they were 40 years ago? >> Is there to be any allowance for increased wisdom, growing up, learning, >> changes of attitudes? >> Is there to be any allowance for the era or environment in which the >> offense happened? >> >> *From:* Adam Moffett >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:09 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT slightly political >> >> Reminds me of the Black Mirror episode called "Nosedive" >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosedive >> It's available on Netflix. >> >> Basically, scoring on social media gets used for everything. The prices >> you pay for services, whether you're allowed into a condo, whether you get >> to have and keep a job, how the police treat you. I get the impression >> that it's not codified as law, just a fact of the presence of social media >> and ubiquitous access to it. Basically the Facebook distopia. It's a good >> episode....and a good series in general. >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: 12/7/2017 10:56:23 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT slightly political >> >> >> Maybe they could start with China’s citizenship score essentially ranking >> everyone’s behavior. >> >> *From:* Nate Burke >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 7, 2017 8:54 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT slightly political >> >> Facebook and Google already have all the data of your >> likes/dislikes/beliefs (even one's you are not sure of). Seems like the >> next logical step would be a compatibility matrix. You are only allowed to >> interact with a potential date if you have >90% compatibility. Otherwise >> your advances would be moot, and therefore unwanted. Proximity devices >> would allow you to go into a club, and see all potential matches nearby. >> As you approach, their name badge would either turn green or red. If you >> get too close to a Red, it will start flashing, thereby alerting all close >> by to be on the lookout for potential harassing behavior. >> >> On 12/7/2017 9:46 AM, Bill Prince wrote: >> >> Yeah. Parse these two statements, and how they might come across verbally. >> >> Don't! Stop! >> >> Don't stop! >> >> >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 12/7/2017 7:44 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> All young men trying to get a date could be classified as a predator. >> There is the prey and the predator. It is a matter degree. Unwanted >> attention, unwanted proximity, unwanted touching. Until the girl decided >> the kid is OK then the playing hard to get games morphs into no=yes and so >> forth. >> >> Is a kid screwing up his courage to go in for a kiss at the end of a date >> risking becoming a criminal? >> >> Hitting a good looking woman is now considered sexual predation. >> >> NPR had a good example. Good looking woman at a party. George Clooney >> and Steve Buscemi both hit on her at different times. Both use the exact >> same words. Perhaps different deliveries but the exact same words. The >> woman is mesmerized by the attention by George and feels harassed by >> Buscemi. >> >> How can you codify how people are supposed to behave? >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 6, 2017 8:29 PM >> *To:* Animal Farm >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT slightly political >> >> All sexual predators...from Top to bottom, regardless of party, should >> be pecked to death...I have four daughters. That Alabama pedophile would >> have disappeared. End of story. >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Dec 6, 2017 8:26 PM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I feel bad for that guy. hes about to get his rectum widened and not so >>> much as mcdouble with cheese for dinner >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Craig House <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Al Franken = injured chicken LOL >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 6, 2017 8:15:10 PM >>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] OT slightly political >>>> >>>> >>>> One of my aunts married a guy that had a small factory farm. He raised >>>> fryers. Those chickens you get at KFC. They were allowed to run around in >>>> a very large room. Thousands of them per room, maybe tens of thousands. >>>> He had lots of buildings with rooms like that. >>>> There was this tiny conveyer of chicken feed (maybe 3 inches wide) that >>>> snaked round the room so they were never farther than a dozen steps from >>>> food. I think it took 6 or 8 weeks from hatching before they were ready >>>> for market. >>>> >>>> Toward the end of their existence they would get so heavy they would >>>> just park and the conveyer and not really move. I don’t recall >>>> how they got water (this was 50 years ago). >>>> >>>> If one got injured somehow, perhaps getting something caught in the >>>> conveyer or whatever, if there was a single spot of blood, the other >>>> chickens would notice and in short order peck the injured chicken to >>>> death. Even a dot of red ink was enough. They would pile on and do them >>>> in. >>>> >>>> I see some parallels. Humans are chickens sometimes. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
