If the ISP Is required to run it's own filtering, without a 3rd party,
also be prepared for the increase of staff and their counseling needs.
I was just trying to find it, but my Googleskillz are failing me
presently. I remember reading an article where it was talking about a
content blocking company, the Employee turnover rate was extremely high,
and many required counseling after leaving the job because of what they
saw while determining if content should be blocked.
On 2/6/2018 10:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The proposed solution is that any ISP over 500 customers has to
provide some kind of blocking technology to prevent harm to minors.
And it cannot be a 3rd party solution.
I want to come up with an exhaustive list of all the potential ways
minors can select harmful things on the internet. There is more than
just web pages out there.
*From:* Zach Underwood
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:01 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] blocking
Are you talking about
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/states-introduce-dubious-legislation-ransom-internet
this style of blocking?
If you are talking about that style of blocking then as ISP we fight
this as it is not the ISP job to block.
If someone wants to block this type of content when the parent should
be in change of installing blocking software and picking what should
be blocked.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
I have some proposed legislation I am facing about porn blocking
again. But they are not defining the type of service. It is one
thing to block web traffic, but how about netflix or twitter or
skype or......
I want to play defense here and force the lawmakers to define
exactly what we need to block.
So can you guys help me develop a list of all the things we would
have to analyze and block if we were going to attempt to create a
true device that protects kids.
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA)
My website <http://zachunderwood.me>
advance-networking.com <http://advance-networking.com>
