pffft... parents. Its the governments role to raise children, not parents, where have you been? 1950?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > But the parents already do have the option to buy something on their own > (Net Nanny etc). > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 2/8/2018 12:31:36 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave > > What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this case) > approve a group of content filtering companies for end users. > > Then mandate AT MOST that the ISP allow/offer at least one of those up to > customers as a certified filtering option. > > > > Again, not mandatory, but as viable options that are semi-pushed from the > ISP side, still for profit. > > > > It’s just too much and too variant to have to mandate the ISP do any kind > of filtering ‘mid-stream’ style. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:30 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave > > > > Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally about offering > content filtering as a value add. > > > > An initial conversation with Trustwave seemed promising, and I'm supposed > to have a follow up to discuss tech details later. > > > > But does anybody still do this? Is there still consumer interest? How > much are/were you selling it for? > > > >
