But the parents already do have the option to buy something on their own
(Net Nanny etc).
------ Original Message ------
From: "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 2/8/2018 12:31:36 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave
What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this
case) approve a group of content filtering companies for end users.
Then mandate AT MOST that the ISP allow/offer at least one of those up
to customers as a certified filtering option.
Again, not mandatory, but as viable options that are semi-pushed from
the ISP side, still for profit.
It’s just too much and too variant to have to mandate the ISP do any
kind of filtering ‘mid-stream’ style.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:30 AM
To:[email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave
Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally about
offering content filtering as a value add.
An initial conversation with Trustwave seemed promising, and I'm
supposed to have a follow up to discuss tech details later.
But does anybody still do this? Is there still consumer interest? How
much are/were you selling it for?
