What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this case) approve a group of content filtering companies for end users. Then mandate AT MOST that the ISP allow/offer at least one of those up to customers as a certified filtering option.
Again, not mandatory, but as viable options that are semi-pushed from the ISP side, still for profit. It’s just too much and too variant to have to mandate the ISP do any kind of filtering ‘mid-stream’ style. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally about offering content filtering as a value add. An initial conversation with Trustwave seemed promising, and I'm supposed to have a follow up to discuss tech details later. But does anybody still do this? Is there still consumer interest? How much are/were you selling it for?
