IMO, completely 100% wrong. You don't get to come into my house or tell
a private company that we don't meet your moral standards. The people
can make their own damn decisions. Stop trying to legislate morality.
The politicians that try this stuff are usually the ones that end up
being freaks or porn addicts.
Public institutions, schools, libraries, etc. yeah, filter away. That's
standard here in KIllinois, too.
On 2/8/2018 11:31 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
What should really happen law wise, is that the state (Utah in this
case) approve a group of content filtering companies for end users.
Then mandate AT MOST that the ISP allow/offer at least one of those up
to customers as a certified filtering option.
Again, not mandatory, but as viable options that are semi-pushed from
the ISP side, still for profit.
It’s just too much and too variant to have to mandate the ISP do any
kind of filtering ‘mid-stream’ style.
*From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:30 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Content filtering - Trustwave
Unrelated to Chuck's thread, we started talking internally about
offering content filtering as a value add.
An initial conversation with Trustwave seemed promising, and I'm
supposed to have a follow up to discuss tech details later.
But does anybody still do this? Is there still consumer interest?
How much are/were you selling it for?
