In general, ePMP.

Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> 
> So if y’all were helping a friend would you recommend 450 or ePMP?
>  
> I doubt he will ever have more than 50 customers. 
>  
> I have not had much experience with ePMP in the last 4 years.  I didn’t like 
> it when it first came out. 
>  
> From: Joe Novak
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:56 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
>  
> We have a few towers with AF5x and Cambium EPMP co-existing. Some have 
> vertical separation, some are grain elevators. Just gotta have some frequency 
> separation. I really like them. Latency under load is good, it's a purpose 
> built radio and I think it serves it's purpose well. If he has the option to 
> use the AF5XHD or whatever the naming convention is even better, I think it 
> hit general availability.
>  
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Two AF5x on same tower, One AP on second tower 20 ft away...all other radios 
>> within 4 mile radius...
>> 
>> Jaime Solorza
>>  
>>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:43 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>> All on the same tower, right?
>>>  
>>> From: Jaime Solorza
>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:41 PM
>>> To: Animal Farm
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
>>>  
>>> Yes..I have two AF5X links as PTP and 25 radios all in 5 GHz off 4 APs in 
>>> Fabens, Texas sharing spectrum with 3 WISPs...no issues...
>>>  
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>  
>>>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:32 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>> Talking to a friend that wants to build a small wisp.  He is about 5.5 
>>>> miles from a backbone connection.  I would suggest AF5X to him but he is 
>>>> gonna want to use 5 GHz for his wisp I presume. 
>>>>  
>>>> Can an AF5X and some 5 GHz cambium (or others) access points        
>>>> peacefully coexist on a tower?
>>>> Very rural area.  Not expecting much interference other than home routers. 
> 
>  

Reply via email to