I was given the budget if i wanted it for 450. After alot of consideration
i just couldnt justify the 450 cost over epmp. Only a marginal aggregate
gain. Mumimopappajohnspizza is so far not hammered snot like it was going
to be, and hurt more by interference. Afaik 450 was limited in band as well.
Epmp is so cheap you can keep throwing access points at it, different bands
for different distances. We limit epmp to 8 miles, stay predominately in
5.1, 5 8 has more power, but everybody and their brother mucks it up.
We do lite APs and buy 4 packs of the upgrade keys so we always have them
on hand.
I used to think cambium shot themselves in the foot with epmp. But really,
they just robbed ubiquiti of a market share

On Feb 12, 2018 9:55 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

Wrong description. They are high value.

Build quality is actually pretty good.


On 2/12/2018 7:20 PM, TJ Trout wrote:

af11's are pretty cheap....

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <jeffl...@att.net>

> In general, ePMP.
> Jeff Broadwick
> CTIconnect
> 312-205-2519 <%28312%29%20205-2519> Office
> 574-220-7826 <%28574%29%20220-7826> Cell
> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> So if y’all were helping a friend would you recommend 450 or ePMP?
> I doubt he will ever have more than 50 customers.
> I have not had much experience with ePMP in the last 4 years.  I didn’t
> like it when it first came out.
> *From:* Joe Novak
> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 4:56 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
> We have a few towers with AF5x and Cambium EPMP co-existing. Some have
> vertical separation, some are grain elevators. Just gotta have some
> frequency separation. I really like them. Latency under load is good, it's
> a purpose built radio and I think it serves it's purpose well. If he has
> the option to use the AF5XHD or whatever the naming convention is even
> better, I think it hit general availability.
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Two AF5x on same tower, One AP on second tower 20 ft away...all other
>> radios within 4 mile radius...
>> Jaime Solorza
>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:43 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>> All on the same tower, right?
>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 4:41 PM
>>> *To:* Animal Farm
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
>>> Yes..I have two AF5X links as PTP and 25 radios all in 5 GHz off 4 APs
>>> in Fabens, Texas sharing spectrum with 3 WISPs...no issues...
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:32 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>> Talking to a friend that wants to build a small wisp.  He is about 5.5
>>>> miles from a backbone connection.  I would suggest AF5X to him but he is
>>>> gonna want to use 5 GHz for his wisp I presume.
>>>> Can an AF5X and some 5 GHz cambium (or others) access points peacefully
>>>> coexist on a tower?
>>>> Very rural area.  Not expecting much interference other than home
>>>> routers.

Reply via email to