12” Depth: 
15” Depth: 
18” Depth: 

So you get the middle size for $82.  
Seems a bit tight to me, if you have a 144 strand splice in a 21 inch splice 
case and 50 feet of slack.  
I wonder what the 18” will cost.  I may try this and the round one.  

From: Chris Fabien 
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 1:52 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

We get 17x30x15. Tyco B size will fit but it's tight. A is no prob.

On Feb 15, 2018 2:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

  A splice case and slack will fit OK?
  Which size do you get for the $82?

  From: Chris Fabien 
  Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 12:04 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

  https://oldcastleenclosures.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/WA-Carson_1730.pdf 

  Cheked our last order, $82 with the lid bolts. Milennium is our local 
supplier that stocks them. 

  On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

    Could you give me a source for your handholes?
    I took 36” HDPE culvert and and cut it into 24” slices and made steel lids. 
 But I have more than $75 into just the culvert piece alone.  

    From: Chris Fabien 
    Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 10:53 AM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

    Chuck, I would love to hear your lower cost idea. Right now we use mainly 
HDPE handholes, not load rated, and place them so it's unlikely to see heavy 
traffic. We have had one crushed so far by a tractor, so its not perfect (but 
the fiber was OKAY). But they are $75ea vs $200 for  a polymer concrete, worth 
having to replace one or two a year.   

    This video I only recently found, but it explains this tapping architecture 
very well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k78dC2z1mWc  I wish I had seen this 
video 5 years ago. It seemed a lot more "wierd" when we were suggested the idea 
by another fiber upstart guy. 

    Mark, I've done lots of drawings of distributed splits inside a 12-count 
main and folding legs back along the mainline and what not. Certainly a viable 
approach. I think it is overly complicated, especially when at some handholes 
you are splicing drops to go north and at some you are splicing to go south and 
what not. I think the tapped trunk layout is working very well for us in our 
area, certainly has some compromises but I'm happy with it. You do have to have 
the loss values worked out upfront. If you leave some extra margin you can 
tolerate cutting in an extra splitter here or there as houses are built and 
what not. 

    Chuck, its very much same idea as Coax taps in CATV, the math pretty much 
the same. 

    Chris


    On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

      What are you using for handholes?  Full traffic rated handholes are a 
large expense.
      I am working on a lower cost idea, but if something equivalent to my idea 
already exists I would rather just buy them.  

      From: Chris Fabien 
      Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 9:01 PM
      To: [email protected] 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

      Regarding the distance, our ZTE will support up to 60 km, but max 
difference of 20km between ONU on one PON. There's just a range parameter that 
needs to be set.  

      We ordered C+ optics and see a real optical budget of 33dB. The OLT is 
about +5.5 tx and -34 min rx sensitivity. The ONU about + 0.5 tx and -28 rx 
sens. 

      I've been very impressed with the optical performance.

      We did test the ubnt as well. Went with ZTE

      On Feb 12, 2018 1:23 PM, "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> wrote:

        That's also a compelling point.

        It's not a simple question for sure.  

        The other reason I would think about GPON is that if a larger company 
wanted to purchase our network down the road I have to think about what THEY 
will prefer.  They'll probably prefer PON. 

        Humans are horrible at assessing their own biases, but I probably have 
a bias towards ethernet because it's familiar.  I try to bear that in mind too.


        ------ Original Message ------
        From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
        To: [email protected]
        Sent: 2/12/2018 1:13:18 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

          When doing full throttle Calix GPON we have about $570 invested in 
cpe electronics, splitter, ont/olt/onu etc.  Everything but fiber and outdoor 
cabinets.  

          When doing active Ethernet you can come in closer to $100 per 
customer.  
          For non regulated greenfield, I am having a hard time convincing 
myself to do PON.  

          From: Mark - Myakka Technologies 
          Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 11:09 AM
          To: Chuck McCown 
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

          Chuck,

          PLC splitter in spice case doing full fusion splicing.

          -- 
          Best regards,
          Mark                            mailto:[email protected]

          Myakka Technologies, Inc.
          www.MyakkaTech.com

          ------

          Monday, February 12, 2018, 12:09:32 PM, you wrote:


               Are you using splitters in splice cases or in cross connect 
boxes?

                From: Mark - Myakka Technologies
                Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 9:55 AM
                To: Adam Moffett
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

                Adam,

                There are some ranging things you have to consider.  "The 
requirement
                when deploying ONTs are the maximum distance between two ONTs 
cannot
                exceed 20Km."

                The way we have done this is to reuse fibers as we travel down 
long stretches of roads between neighborhoods.

                We will deploy a 1x32 splitter in the field. We will splice 
that into the last 3 ribbons/tubes of our fiber.  Example, if we were using a 
144 count cable, ribbons 10-12 will be spliced into.  After a few miles 
depending on density or distance, we will splice in another 1x32 splitter to 
ribbons 10-12.  We just keep doing this until we run out of light budget.  

                We build to the lots passed, so we are not trying to optimize 
max usage per port.  Currently, we average about 50% utilization on our ports.





                -- 
                Best regards,
                Mark                            mailto:[email protected]

                Myakka Technologies, Inc.
                www.MyakkaTech.com

                ------

                Monday, February 12, 2018, 11:38:39 AM, you wrote:


                     Maybe I need to review the math.

                      I was figuring on several small splitters along the 
route.  I didn't compare to a 1x32 in the cabinet because I figured if I 
brought every fiber back to the cabinet then I didn't save anything versus 
ethernet.


                      ------ Original Message ------
                      From: "Mark - Myakka Technologies" <[email protected]>
                      To: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
                      Sent: 2/12/2018 11:30:46 AM
                      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT


                           Adam,

                            How far are you going?  We are pushing almost 20 
miles on a 1x32 split.  Are you using one 1x32 or multiple smaller splitters?

                            -- 
                            Best regards,
                            Mark                            
mailto:[email protected]

                            Myakka Technologies, Inc.
                            www.MyakkaTech.com

                            ------

                            Sunday, February 11, 2018, 10:24:30 PM, you wrote:


                                 I'm looking at rural areas (like a few houses 
per mile).  As I'm looking at hypothetical power budgets for PON, I'm finding 
that if I run the line down the road and put splitters on the pole I can split 
5-6 times and then I'm getting too low on db to keep going down the road.  At 5 
or so houses per port, a 1U, 8 port ONT is no denser than a 1U switch.

                                Your stated reasons for PON are all correct.  
The numbers just aren't seeming to work out for me.

                                I also figure if I install enough fibers for 
AE, I can still switch to PON some day if I want to.

                                We would never max out the PON port, but 
looking back on the past 15 years of growth in consumption I wonder if I should 
ever say "never". In AE I can put 100Gig in every house if I have to.  I'll 
"never" have to do that as far as I can imagine, but my imagination could be 
limited.

                                -Adam


                                ------ Original Message ------
                                From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
                                To: [email protected]
                                Sent: 2/11/2018 9:28:34 PM
                                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT


                                 A few reasons...

                                Port cost is still fairly high.

                                More splicing.

                                More fiber required.

                                Larger chassis required.

                                More power required.

                                More battery backup required.

                                Consumers not even close to using up 1-2 
generations back of PON capacity in most places.

                                On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Chuck McCown 
<[email protected]> wrote:

                                 So, why do PON and not active in these super 
cheap optics days?

                                From: Chuck Hogg
                                Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 6:10 PM
                                To: [email protected]
                                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

                                We are walking away from them and Alphion...I 
think Mark's product with Zhone is different.

                                Regards,
                                Chuck

                                On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Mike Hammett 
<[email protected]> wrote:

                                 I think Chuck Hogg walked far away from 
DASAN...  or maybe it was DASAN that rescued them from the one they walked far 
away form. I don't remember which.  ;-)



                                -----
                                Mike Hammett
                                Intelligent Computing Solutions

                                Midwest Internet Exchange

                                The Brothers WISP





------------------------------------------------
                                From: "Jason McKemie" 
<[email protected]>
                                To: [email protected]
                                Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 4:35:53 PM
                                Subject: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT

                                In light of finding out that Calix's offering 
is not going to be anywhere near within budget, does anyone else have any other 
suggestions? 

                                I found these guys, but have never heard of 
them:
                                
http://www.richerlink.com/en/products.asp?ClassID=116

                                It looks like DASAN also has an option - I've 
at least heard of them:
                                
http://www.dasannetworks.com/product_images/V5806_20140520174927.pdf

                                -Jason 
                                 
                                 
                                 
                           
                     
               


Reply via email to