The World version I got

did not have a US option

Mitch


On 5/1/2018 3:51 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
They do

Jaime Solorza

On Tue, May 1, 2018, 2:24 PM Jay Weekley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I always assumed the international version would have the U.S. as
    an option.



    Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone


    -------- Original message --------
    From: Mitch Koep <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Date: 5/1/18 3:14 PM (GMT-06:00)
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

    I got into a jam and ordered from Amazon and a third party re
    seller sent me

    non US products. I had to ship them all back

    Should have waited for my normal supplier LOL

    Mitch


    On 5/1/2018 2:48 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:

    I also note, that we ordered US radios, and they were out of
    stock so we get non-us radios shipped to us before…

    *From:*Af <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
    *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian (List Account)
    *Sent:* Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:15 PM
    *To:* af <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action

    I went and pulled the FCC cert for the FCC ID that they gave,
    definitely only certified for 5.7 in the US.

    I figure there are two options here:

    1) They're knowingly using a non-US radio in the US, or they've
    otherwise hacked the US radio to operate outside of the band. 
     In this case, good luck to them.

    2) Somehow they've gotten a non-US radio in the US without
    knowing, and/or the UBNT software didn't limit them to the US
    bands for some reason.  In this case, I hope that they can plead
    ignorance, and treat it as a learning experience.

    A lot of the problem anymore is that there are so many different
    iterations of radios out there, and as a result, it can be
    difficult to keep track of which bands each is legal for.  If the
    radios don't enforce it, there's a good chance that someone will
    unintentionally turn a radio up on a band the radio isn't
    authorized for.  On the other hand, one would think that you'd be
    aware of TWDR and avoid that frequency range like the plague....

    On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Mathew Howard
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        It says it was a Rocket5 AC Prism... I don't think those ever
        had updated stickers (I could be wrong, but that's a
        relatively new design, which I think was after all that
        nonsense). I wonder if it was the non-US model...

        On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Seth Mattinen
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote:

                LV.NET <http://LV.NET> <http://LV.NET>; LAS VEGAS,
                NEVADA �89104. ��Notice of Unlicensed Operation
                and Notification of Harmful Interference issued for
                interference complaint to FAA Terminal Doppler
                Weather Radar operating on 5645 MHz in Las Vegas,
                Nevada. Action by: �Regional Director, Region
                Three, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: �04/27/2018 by
                Notice. �EB
                https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.docx
                https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.pdf



            Only an idiot would use a TDWR frequency anywhere near an
            airport with one. That's just challenging someone to come
            find you.

            Is that an DFS unlock code with updated sticker required
            model they were using, but didn't bother to actually put
            the new sticker on it?



--
    *Forrest Christian*/CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./

    Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602

    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
    http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/>

    <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
    <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>



Reply via email to