And lends more credibility to the industry as a whole On Wed, May 2, 2018, 9:47 AM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's a bit more than four rules... > > In 5ghz alone, there's EIRP in UNII-1, UNII-2 and UNII-3, which are all > different, then there's PtP vs PtMP. > Then there are the registration requirements and EIRP limits in 3.65ghz, > which 75% of operates seem to either have very little understanding of, or > just plain ignore. Not to mention the fact that there are plenty of > operators who don't even understand how to calculate EIRP properly... just > the other day, I saw somebody on the Baicells facebook group that thought > they could use a 10 watt 3.65ghz eNB in the US because a lawyer told them > that they could use up to 25 watts... > > But the purpose of an audit would be to have somebody check over all your > stuff and make sure that you actually have everything setup to conform to > the rules - whether it be because of poor understanding of the rules, or > just to check for mistakes, it would be a very useful service. > > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Matt Hoppes < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Why do you need an audit? There are like 4 rules to follow. >> >> EIRP for: >> 900mhz >> 2.4GHz >> 3.65GHz >> 5GHz >> >> Add power plus antenna. >> >> On May 2, 2018, at 01:15, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> wanna get some interesting offlist hate mail? start naming names of >> vendors who sell non US to the US market on the AFMUG list..... they watch. >> because theyre fucking scumbags.. I hope this operator gets fucked, and I >> hope they ultimately seek out the vendor and nail them somehow as well. Im >> dealing with some 3ghz nonsense right now, had to kill an AP today over it, >> Ill almost guarantee the operator has a non US nanobridge up.I got one once >> and when I started wondering, the vendor offlisted me, because they sold me >> some nonsense. I do my best to operate legally, and if Im not sure I dont >> operate or operate under power. You check my network, if you find something >> out of whack its operator error (me, as in I messed up) not operator >> dickheadedness. If WISPA were worth its salt they would offer a >> "certification" like i mentioned many times previously, where they would >> come in for an at cost audit. But sometimes I dont think WISPA is actually >> interested in our industry actually looking "professional" >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K. Not sure what he >>> eventually settled at. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >>> >>> I'm pretty sure Microserv had a fine over a misconfigured Mikrotik. I >>> seem to think it was $25k, but my memory isn't perfect. >>> I'd be surprised if these guys didn't get slapped though. >>> >>> -Adam >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "David Coudron" <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 5/1/2018 4:17:27 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >>> >>> At the bottom I think they said they will consider what, if any fines >>>> will be levied. At least that is the way I read it. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> David Coudron >>>> [email protected] | Mobile: 612-991-7474 >>>> >>>> Advantenon, Inc. >>>> [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN >>>> 55447 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3500+Vicksburg+Lane+N,+Suite+315,+Plymouth,+MN+55447&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> | www.advantenon.com | Phone: 800-704-4720 | Local: 612-454-1545 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Af <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:15 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >>>> >>>> I noticed there was no fine mentioned. Does that come later? >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>> From: "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: 5/1/2018 2:08:56 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >>>> >>>> On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> LV.NET <http://LV.NET>; LAS VEGAS, NEVADA �89104. ��Notice of >>>>>> Unlicensed Operation and Notification of Harmful Interference issued >>>>>> for interference complaint to FAA Terminal Doppler Weather Radar >>>>>> operating on 5645 MHz in Las Vegas, Nevada. Action by: �Regional >>>>>> Director, Region Three, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: �04/27/2018 by >>>>>> Notice. �EB >>>>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.docx >>>>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.pdf >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Only an idiot would use a TDWR frequency anywhere near an airport with >>>>> one. That's just challenging someone to come find you. >>>>> >>>>> Is that an DFS unlock code with updated sticker required model they >>>>> were using, but didn't bother to actually put the new sticker on it? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
