I tend to agree with you, yet again Mike. Although I still think it is stupid that they didn’t block out that frequency if they knew they were in a radar area.
> On May 2, 2018, at 08:38, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > I don't believe I saw anything in the FCC report that anything was > intentional. For all we know this is as simple as updated the firmware, > entered the unlock code, didn't apply the stupid sticker, DFS code had a > false negative, FCC caught him. > > Usually the reports are full of stuff like, "After 47 attempts to get this > operator to behave correctly, they shat on the agent's face." > > Given the docile tone of the report, I'll assume it was a bad sticker. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 12:15:33 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action > > wanna get some interesting offlist hate mail? start naming names of vendors > who sell non US to the US market on the AFMUG list..... they watch. because > theyre fucking scumbags.. I hope this operator gets fucked, and I hope they > ultimately seek out the vendor and nail them somehow as well. Im dealing with > some 3ghz nonsense right now, had to kill an AP today over it, Ill almost > guarantee the operator has a non US nanobridge up.I got one once and when I > started wondering, the vendor offlisted me, because they sold me some > nonsense. I do my best to operate legally, and if Im not sure I dont operate > or operate under power. You check my network, if you find something out of > whack its operator error (me, as in I messed up) not operator dickheadedness. > If WISPA were worth its salt they would offer a "certification" like i > mentioned many times previously, where they would come in for an at cost > audit. But sometimes I dont think WISPA is actually interested in our > industry actually looking "professional" > >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:30 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K. Not sure what he eventually >> settled at. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett >> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >> >> I'm pretty sure Microserv had a fine over a misconfigured Mikrotik. I >> seem to think it was $25k, but my memory isn't perfect. >> I'd be surprised if these guys didn't get slapped though. >> >> -Adam >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "David Coudron" <david.coud...@advantenon.com> >> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Sent: 5/1/2018 4:17:27 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >> >>> At the bottom I think they said they will consider what, if any fines will >>> be levied. At least that is the way I read it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> David Coudron >>> david.coud...@advantenon.com | Mobile: 612-991-7474 >>> >>> Advantenon, Inc. >>> i...@advantenon.com | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN >>> 55447 | www.advantenon.com | Phone: 800-704-4720 | Local: 612-454-1545 >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:15 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >>> >>> I noticed there was no fine mentioned. Does that come later? >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us> >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Sent: 5/1/2018 2:08:56 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action >>> >>>>> On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote: >>>>> LV.NET <http://LV.NET>; LAS VEGAS, NEVADA �89104. ��Notice of >>>>> Unlicensed Operation and Notification of Harmful Interference issued >>>>> for interference complaint to FAA Terminal Doppler Weather Radar >>>>> operating on 5645 MHz in Las Vegas, Nevada. Action by: �Regional >>>>> Director, Region Three, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: �04/27/2018 by >>>>> Notice. �EB >>>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.docx >>>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> Only an idiot would use a TDWR frequency anywhere near an airport with >>>> one. That's just challenging someone to come find you. >>>> >>>> Is that an DFS unlock code with updated sticker required model they >>>> were using, but didn't bother to actually put the new sticker on it? >>> >> > >
