I tend to agree with you, yet again Mike. Although I still think it is stupid 
that they didn’t block out that frequency if they knew they were in a radar 
area.

> On May 2, 2018, at 08:38, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> 
> I don't believe I saw anything in the FCC report that anything was 
> intentional. For all we know this is as simple as updated the firmware, 
> entered the unlock code, didn't apply the stupid sticker, DFS code had a 
> false negative, FCC caught him.
> 
> Usually the reports are full of stuff like, "After 47 attempts to get this 
> operator to behave correctly, they shat on the agent's face."
> 
> Given the docile tone of the report, I'll assume it was a bad sticker.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 12:15:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action
> 
> wanna get some interesting offlist hate mail? start naming names of vendors 
> who sell non US to the US market on the AFMUG list..... they watch. because 
> theyre fucking scumbags.. I hope this operator gets fucked, and I hope they 
> ultimately seek out the vendor and nail them somehow as well. Im dealing with 
> some 3ghz nonsense right now, had to kill an AP today over it, Ill almost 
> guarantee the operator has a non US nanobridge up.I got one once and when I 
> started wondering, the vendor offlisted me, because they sold me some 
> nonsense. I do my best to operate legally, and if Im not sure I dont operate 
> or operate under power. You check my network, if you find something out of 
> whack its operator error (me, as in I messed up) not operator dickheadedness. 
> If WISPA were worth its salt they would offer a "certification" like i 
> mentioned many times previously, where they would come in for an at cost 
> audit. But sometimes I dont think WISPA is actually interested in our 
> industry actually looking "professional"
> 
>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:30 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>> I remember Sterling's find was originally $25K.  Not sure what he eventually 
>> settled at.
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:21 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action
>> 
>> I'm pretty sure Microserv had a fine over a misconfigured Mikrotik.  I
>> seem to think it was $25k, but my memory isn't perfect.
>> I'd be surprised if these guys didn't get slapped though.
>> 
>> -Adam
>> 
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "David Coudron" <david.coud...@advantenon.com>
>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Sent: 5/1/2018 4:17:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action
>> 
>>> At the bottom I think they said they will consider what, if any fines will 
>>> be levied.   At least that is the way I read it.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> David Coudron
>>> david.coud...@advantenon.com  |  Mobile: 612-991-7474
>>> 
>>> Advantenon, Inc.
>>> i...@advantenon.com  |  3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN 
>>> 55447  |  www.advantenon.com  |  Phone: 800-704-4720  |  Local: 612-454-1545
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:15 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action
>>> 
>>> I noticed there was no fine mentioned.  Does that come later?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>> From: "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us>
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: 5/1/2018 2:08:56 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Action
>>> 
>>>>> On 5/1/18 10:51, Tim Hardy wrote:
>>>>> LV.NET <http://LV.NET>; LAS VEGAS, NEVADA �89104. ��Notice of
>>>>> Unlicensed Operation and Notification of Harmful Interference issued
>>>>> for interference complaint to FAA Terminal Doppler Weather Radar
>>>>> operating on 5645 MHz in Las Vegas, Nevada. Action by: �Regional
>>>>> Director, Region Three, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: �04/27/2018 by
>>>>> Notice. �EB
>>>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.docx
>>>>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-350491A1.pdf
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Only an idiot would use a TDWR frequency anywhere near an airport with
>>>> one. That's just challenging someone to come find you.
>>>> 
>>>> Is that an DFS unlock code with updated sticker required model they
>>>> were using, but didn't bother to actually put the new sticker on it?
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to