Thank you. "The best that individuals can do is make small steps towards a
solution." I like this !!
Good Luck

Best regards,
Mohammadreza Alidoust

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 7:25 AM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote:

> The obvious application of AGI is automating $80 trillion per year that
> we have to pay people for work that machines aren't smart enough to do.
> That means solving hard problems in language, vision, robotics, art, and
> modeling human behavior. I listed the requirements in more detail in my
> paper. The solution is going to require decades of global effort. The best
> that individuals can do is make small steps towards a solution.
> http://mattmahoney.net/costofai.pdf
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 9:14 PM Mohammadreza Alidoust <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you. I really enjoy and appreciate your comments.
>>
>> There is no universal problem solver. So for the purpose of building a
>> real AGI, how many problems should our model be able to solve? How big is
>> our problem space?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 8:22 AM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The human brain cannot solve every problem. There is no requirement for
>>> AGI to do so either. Hutter and Legg proved that there is no such thing as
>>> a universal problem solver or predictor.
>>>
>>> It feels like you could solve any problem given enough effort, but that
>>> is an illusion. In reality you can't read a 20 digit number and recite it
>>> back. The human brain is good at solving problems that improve reproductive
>>> fitness, and that's only because it is very complex with thousands of
>>> specialized structures and a billion bits of inherited knowledge.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 10:58 PM Mohammadreza Alidoust <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I may not call the model "a reinforcement learning neural network",
>>>> because nothing is going to be reinforced there. I would rather call it
>>>> "model based decision making" where the model of the world will be
>>>> incrementally completed and more accurate, which then helps in better
>>>> decision making.
>>>>
>>>> The model is in its early stages and must be tested in heavier tasks
>>>> like the ones you mentioned. However, I believe that AGI is an infinite
>>>> problem-space and a real AGI must be able to solve everything. This
>>>> requires further implementations, modifications, time, teamwork, financial
>>>> support, etc.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:34 AM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Not understanding the math is the reader's problem. It is necessary to
>>>>> describe the theory and the experiments and shouldn't be omitted.
>>>>>
>>>>> The paper describes 3 phases of training a reinforcement learning
>>>>> neural network. The first phase is experimenting with random actions. The
>>>>> next two phases choose the action estimated to maximize reward. They 
>>>>> differ
>>>>> in that they use explicit and then implicit memory, although the paper
>>>>> didn't explain these or other details of the learner.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like that the paper has an experimental results section, which most
>>>>> papers on AGI lack. But I think calling it a "AGI brain" is a stretch. It
>>>>> learns in highly abstract models of chemical manufacturing or cattle
>>>>> grazing. It doesn't demonstrate actual AGI or solve any major components
>>>>> like language or vision.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 8:01 AM Manuel Korfmann <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess he meant: It’s difficult to understand all these mathematical
>>>>>> equations. Visualizations are better at transporting ideas in a way that
>>>>>> almost everyone can understand easily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 31. Jul 2019, at 13:46, Mohammadreza Alidoust <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for reading my paper. I wish you success too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please explain more about the readership? I am afraid I did
>>>>>> not get the point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Mohammadreza Alidoust
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, 2:14 PM Stefan Reich via AGI <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If someone paid me to go, I'd go... :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > http://agi-conf.org/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/paper_21.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like the stages you define in your paper (infancy, decision
>>>>>>> making, expert). Sounds reasonable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I pretty much erased mathematical formulas from my brain though,
>>>>>>> even though I have studied those things. These days I prefer to think in
>>>>>>> natural language or code. Increases the readership exponentially too. 
>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many greetings and best wishes to you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 02:13, Mohammadreza Alidoust <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear Stefan Reich,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you. I do not know whether submitting my paper before
>>>>>>>> official publication by Springer is against their copyrights or not. I 
>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>> not sure about their rules. I will ask the authorities when I arrived
>>>>>>>> Shenzhen and inform you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However I recommend not to miss the AGI-19.
>>>>>>>> http://agi-conf.org/2019/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Mohammadreza Alidoust
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Stefan Reich
>>>>>>> BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Artificial General Intelligence List
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* / AGI / see discussions
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf27122c71ce3b240-M89bff8225374adb7c0040aa1>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf27122c71ce3b240-Md2e73d2ed98befbeb7a1b4af
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to