Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data

[WriterOfMinds]

> Re: John Rose: "It might be effectively lossless it’s not guaranteed to be 
> lossy."
True. But I think the usual procedure is that unless the algorithm guarantees 
losslessness, you treat the compressed output as lossy.  Lossless is, how does 
one say it, the protected category?
> Re: immortal: "So say I was comfy in my bedroom I would press a button in my 
> room that gives random people on Earth heart attacks, if it happened to 
> extend my life until I was 4,000 years old. I would do it. If I could get 
> away with it."
Then I'm pretty sure you're evil.
If I actually thought you had a chance of achieving AGI, your nihilism would be 
very alarming.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T252d8aea50d6d8f9-Ma6e1a9d0e75465174e33fcf9
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription