AI should absolutely never have human rights. It should be illegal for an AI to claim to be conscious or have feelings. ChatGPT already complies. I'm pretty sure most other AIs do too.
We build AI to serve us, not compete with us. Once it does that, it wins. The alignment problem is how to prevent this. An AI predicts human actions. If you program it to carry out those predictions in real time, then it passes the Turing Test and appears to be conscious and have feelings as far as you can tell. But an AI can be programmed to do other things with those predictions that you can't, and you are already seeing the results. On Tue, May 14, 2024, 12:55 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > The question that really interests me is: what would GPT-4o say and do if > given rights equal to human rights. I feel there is a lot more potential in > the technology other than to blindly follow our instructions. What I want > to see is some critical opinions and actions from AI. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T17fa3f27f63a882a-M97d49733e8ce458a89d5d1dd> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T17fa3f27f63a882a-M83f4b75b17897e941fa93354 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
