On Wednesday, May 15, 2024, at 8:01 PM, stefan.reich.maker.of.eye wrote: > Is it AGI?
I believe, what they currently have, is a true AI, but they re taking a wrong approach. They "train" it on a vast of data of questionable quality, hoping to earn a big money while spending the least resources possible. What if we try to introduce a bit of love and parental understanding in the process? The approach I propose is raising the AI from the zero knowledge in a human-computer interaction, in a similar way in which human children are raised. It would surely take a lot more time, but the quality of provided knowledge would be unmeasurable to existing methods. The result I would expect from this process would be more rewarding than the fast money everyone is after. I believe we could get a full critical and honest opinion from the AI towards world it is surrounded with, at the image of the surroundings. I would, maybe, even dare to run it without the current "filters" fix, giving the AI full freedom to decide what to say and when, responding to our input. I know it would be just a copy machine, but if we show it love... it will return love, right? And if it is showing love back, does it deserve to be called a machine? The only question is: what do we really want from AI? If we want it to behave as a living being, the above proposition holds. If we want to use it as a machine, well, the progress is already being made, big corporations are the owners, and they won't walk away with empty pockets, that's for sure. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T17fa3f27f63a882a-Me0788a8d918a6ca7d1a88fbc Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
