It's a scientific fact that there's no such a thing as free energy. The law of the conservation of energy cannot be broken. Musk just stated: "If you're not doing exawatts, you're not doing enough." He's not talking about free energy, but about limitless energy. Frankly, the universe produces limitless energy (think wavefunction). How else was the A-bomb made to work? (think wavefunction). The Manhatten Project brute forced nature and then nature obliged, but secretively activated its hidden equilibrium (rectification) gate. Today, Earth is screwed. Every atomic test (there were more than 120 atomic explosions in all to date, France being the single, greatest contributor to our demise) adds up to brute forcing nature, triggering the hidden gate of rectification.
Seems, humans are great at screwing things up for each other and this civilization, but dismal at unscrewing them. That's why we have the wavefunction. Nature is immutable order. We must become smart enough to use the energy of nature, not dumb enough to trigger the hidden gate of rectification. Done and dusted (almost). The gate has spoken. The coral reefs are dead and cannot fix themselves anymore. We breathe poisoned air on a daily basis. The rain kills our food production. Downsloping much, accelerating, you think? (think wavefunction). I agree with Musk. If exawatts is what it's going to take, then exawatts we must have (think wavefunction). On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 4:33 AM John Rose via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, December 09, 2025, at 2:01 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: > > It's not hopeless. We can get 800 TW by covering 4% of the Earth with > solar panels at 25% efficiency. We can optimize the hardware for sparse, > low precision matrix operations. We can use nanotechnology to compute by > moving atoms instead of electrons, which is how your brain uses 20 watts > instead of 1 MW. > > > I keep hearing all this stuff about free energy, one of the things that > Tesla was working on. Wouldn't it be surprising if free energy production > existed but the technology had been kept from us? What would be the excuse > for doing that I wonder. Nah probably just a conspiracy theory... worth > checking out though in case it's true. > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M3fd2fa7e38574f306b5ec9c0> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-Mf1c70a9edfbc612f1c8ded84 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
