Sergio: much more advanced example is emergent inference (EI). There is an infinite variety of cases (I call them causets) that can arise. To each one, there corresponds exactly one algorithm, which defines the response behavior. There are infinitely many of these algorithms, but EI maps each case to its corresponding algorithm. One-on-one. It doesn't mean you actually *know* the solutions to all problems. But it does mean that, if and when you are presented with one of them, EI will find the solution for you.
"Fuck off, Sergio" What is the "exactly one algorithm, which defines the response behavior" to this statement? What is the right conversational response? The mathematically, logically, EI correct response? "EI has nothing to do with reality, Sergio." What is the "exactly one algorithm, which defines the response behavior" to this statement? What is the right conversational [(or email, or group posting] response? The mathematically, logically, EI correct response? "You never produce real world examples of the problems EI can solve, Sergio" What is the "exactly one algorithm, which defines the response behavior" to this statement? What is the right conversational [(or email, or group posting] response? The mathematically, logically, EI correct response? "Hello, Sergio..." What is the "exactly one algorithm, which defines the response behavior" to this statement? What is the right conversational [(or email, or group posting] response? The mathematically, logically, EI correct response? Have you got the point of the above examples? The above are examples of conversation - and equally they could be of texts - or indeed of language use generally. Here are the "rules" of language. At any given point - after any given sentence - of which the above four sentences are examples - **an endless diversity of responses (or continuations) are possible**. Or to put it another way, there are no rules. There is no *generic* let alone quantitive limit to the diversity of language responses/associations. IOW logic, maths, EI, and everything currently being used in AGI (which are all set-based) have nothing to do with language - . Language is a creative medium that involves creative thought - it is divergent/fluid/ill-structured/wicked as opposed to convergent/crystallised/well-structured/tame. It's an entirely different REALM of intelligence. (One can go on from this to show that ALL REAL-WORLD REASONING of any form is similarly creative and of a different realm, but another time...) ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
