On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]>wrote: If you...wish to be Don Quixote's who refuse to subject their ideas/systems to any real, empirical test, (a la Don Q), that is your right.
But the point I made is a good one, & needs insisting on... A proper technological field should have an insistence on empirical testing. Yours signally *doesn't*. ------------------------------------ Well this is reasonable and we have all explained that we don't yet know how to make true AGI programs that are capable of human-like learning that would be efficient enough to watch. On the other hands most of us can point to some actions of computer programs that certainly looks like the work of human-like mental capabilities. So what would constitute a real empirical test given the fact that we are still at the dawn of the development of true AGI? Jim Bomer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
