Steve: Until that happens, AGI is a complete non-starter. Steve,
This is such cobblers It really hurts to see you guys get involved in extraordinarily intricate discussions about the hypothetical machinery an AGI needs, when you haven't got a clue as to what an AGI does. If you have a robot that can do what the simplest organisms do - and that is navigate a strip of rocky ground - *any* strip of such ground within reason - then you have an AGI /sub-AGI. And you'll also have a commercially useful robot. Now that'll certainly be hard, but organisms can do it with just a few hundred or thousand neurons, and no differential equations, maths, or logic - difficult to believe, I know, but it's true. So it won't be *that* hard. Start with the problems an AGI has to solve. What would you need for a simple robotic rover that can navigate any rocky terrain ? (a problem BTW which roboticists are actually addressing right now). ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
