On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote: > Ben is making a similar mistake with his NLP - trying to construct a super > advanced linguist/linguistic system - when if you did want a language-using > AGI, (and you have to be mad as a hatter to even think about one at this > point)
Can't speak for Ben, but I am at least that mad. I have previously identified 10 or 20 (at least) principled ways to go about creating an AGI, which is why I am OK with the various teams pursuing various goals. I am not OK with some of the principled architectures being completely ignored, which will change when I get my hands on a few million. But you could have been partially satisfied by my suggestion to leave a robot in the middle of space, or in other words the question "how rich an environment do you need to become a mechanized genius". AT ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
