On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:31 PM, ARAKAWA Naoya <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012/09/12, at 0:19, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> AT:Well, let's just say that one of my working hypotheses is that "seeing" >> may be too little for AGI. >> >> Well, the question is - why does an agent need sight anyway? >> We don't understand (*are* there any theories?) at what point an agent >> needs sight. > > An agent doesn't need sight (until a particular task requires it). > There are many blind people conducting independent lives.
When you do a Google search for "funny videos", the results should ideally be ranked by a program that judges the humor content of videos. This is something that humans can do. Is there any reason that AGI should not have this capability? -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
