On 2012/09/12, at 0:19, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote:
> AT:Well, let's just say that one of my working hypotheses is that "seeing" > may be too little for AGI. > > Well, the question is - why does an agent need sight anyway? > We don't understand (*are* there any theories?) at what point an agent needs > sight. An agent doesn't need sight (until a particular task requires it). There are many blind people conducting independent lives. > It may be that a real-world-worthy robot first needs a kinaesthetic sense of > its body and surroundings. If robotics emulates evolution, that would be correct. -- Naoya Arakawa ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
