PM & Aaron,

You do realise that whatever semantic net system you use must apply to not just 
one chair, but chair after chair – image after image?

Bearing that in mind, explain the elements of your semantic net which you will 
use to analyse these fairly simple figures as **chairs**::

http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/95781/95781,1218564477,2/stock-vector-modern-chair-vector-16059484.jpg

Let’s label these chairs 1-25  (going L to R from the top down, row after row)

Start with just 1. and 2. top left and explain how your net will recognize 2 as 
another example of 1.

How IOW do you define a “chair” in terms of simple abstract forms?

Then we can apply your system, successively, to 3. 4. etc.

This is the problem that has defeated all AGI-ers and all psychologists and 
philosophers so far. 

But Aaron (and PM?) has a semantic net solution to it -   if you can solve 
jungle scenes, this should be a piece of cake.

I am saying, Aaron, you do not understand this problem – the problem of  visual 
object recognition/conceptualisation//applicability of semantic nets.

You are saying you do – and it’s me who is confused. Show me.





From: Piaget Modeler 
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 4:41 PM
To: AGI 
Subject: RE: [agi] Re: Superficiality Produces Misunderstanding - Not Good 
Enough

Mike,  

When you type "Chair" what should happen is the AGI's model should activate the 
chair concept
first at a perceptual level to form the pixels into the words, then at a 
linguistic level to form letters
into a word, then at a conceptual level, then at a simulation level where 
images of chair instances 
are evoked.  

This is just simple activation.  Semantic networks tied into perception and 
simulation would achieve 
the necessary effect you seek.  Transformations on these 
perception-simulation-semantic networks 
is what much of Piaget's work was about.

~PM.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [agi] Re: Superficiality Produces Misunderstanding - Not Good 
Enough
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:09:30 +0100


CHAIR

...

It should be able to handle any transformation of the concept, as in

DRAW ME (or POINT TO/RECOGNIZE)  A CHAIR IN TWO PIECES –..

..SQUASHED
..IN PIECES
-HALF VISIBLE
..WITH AN ARM MISSING
...WITH NO SEAT
..IN POLKA DOTS
...WITH RED STRIPES

Concepts are designed for a world of everchanging, everevolving multiform 
objects (and actions).  Semantic networks have zero creativity or adaptability 
– are applicable only to a uniform set of objects, (basically a database) -  
and also, crucially, have zero ability to physically recognize or interact with 
the relevant objects. I’ve been into it at length recently. You’re the one not 
paying attention.

The suggestion that networks or similar can handle concepts is completely 
absurd.

This is yet another form of the central problem of AGI, which you clearly do 
not understand – and I’m not trying to be abusive  – I’ve been realising this 
again recently – people here are culturally punchdrunk with concepts like 
*concept* and *creativity*, and just don’t understand them in terms of AGI.

From: Jim Bromer 
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:04 PM
To: AGI 
Subject: Re: [agi] Re: Superficiality Produces Misunderstanding - Not Good 
Enough

Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote:
AI doesn’t handle concepts.
 

Give me one example to prove that AI doesn't handle concepts.
Jim Bromer



On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote:

  Jim: Mike refuses to try to understand what I am saying because he would have 
to give up his sense of a superior point of view in order to understand it

  Concepts have nothing to do with semantic networks. 
  AI doesn’t handle concepts.
  That is the challenge for AGI.
  The form of concepts is graphics.
  The referents of concepts are infinite realms..

  What are you saying that is relevant to this, or that can challenge this – 
from any evidence?

















        AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription   


      AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription   

      AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription  

      AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription   



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to