I thought I was v. clear, PM – you did not apply your system of analysis directly to the chairs – or the smallest part or dimension of the chairs.
Until you do that, you will never be applying your system to the problem of AGI, wh. in all its incarnations is as I’ve outlined – dealing with multiform blocks.. I don’t believe there is a point in constructing any system that does not *start* by addressing the problem it is supposed to solve – I don’t think you’ll find the great majority of successful inventors/innovators agree with that fundamental principle. You’re free. Go in peace. From: Piaget Modeler Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:19 AM To: AGI Subject: RE: [agi] The Fundamental Misunderstanding in AGI [was Superficiality] Please answer my question Mike, so that I can be free. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [agi] The Fundamental Misunderstanding in AGI [was Superficiality] Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:01:26 +0100 PM: “Does that answer your question, if not why not? These are the elements...” [PM, I’ll come back to this later on] AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
